While our main focus is on youth baseball bat reviews and evaluations, it’s equally important that we provide a very clear and concise breakdown of the USA BAT Standard. By highlighting the normal’s major points and presenting an unbiased on the complete financial impact, we expect to assist the affected families adapt as quickly as possible.
Any bat you have of a 2017 model and older will become helpless.
By implementing a brand new bat performance benchmark, this consequently makes all bats of a 2017 model and older illegal. Under no circumstances will USA Baseball permit these bats for use for matches or even practices.
Expect all 2018 youth baseball bats to perform at “wood-like levels.
Each USA Baseball publication that discusses the new benchmark repeatedly mentions the importance of upholding the “long term integrity of the match.” Judging from this statement, it’s safe to presume that all 2018 youth baseball bats will create less electricity when compared to elderly bat versions. Bats that produce “wood-like level” swings will not deliver the amount of pop found in aluminum and composite bats from years past.
The USABAT Standard won’t incorporate a drop-weight limit.
Contrary to the BBCOR which limits to some baseball bat’s length/weight ratio to fall -3, the USABAT Standard won’t have a limitation. This gives players of all statures and dimensions the liberty to swing any dimension bat just as long as the bat displays the USABAT Stamp.
USA Baseball today allows 2 5/8 barrel bats. These barrel sizes will be the only two accessible for players.
The USABAT Standard will not affect the Senior Division of Little League.
USA Baseball now allows 2 5/8 barrel bats. These barrel sizes will be the only two accessible for players.
WHY DID USA BASEBALL MAKE A CHANGE?
As previously mentioned, USA Baseball’s #1 reason for changing the bat performance standard would be to preserve “the long-term integrity of the game”. According to USA Baseball, recent technological improvements have emerged that allow manufactures to create non-wood bats that function at wood-like levels. By using these this of bat, then the amount of high scoring childhood baseball games will decrease. Needless to say, there’ll always be games which feature a whole lot of runs but the consequences of witnessing these high scoring games will diminish. The new norm reduces the trampoline impact on the baseball over the old conventional thereby decreasing the amount of pop youth gamers are accustom to generating. By using the USABAT Standard, USA Baseball considers they’ve taken a major step towards bringing back realistic offensive statistics back that have vanished during the new composite bat age.
By adopting a more uniformed standard, USA Baseball also normalizes the bat performance regulations for all players no matter league affiliation. Bear in mind, the vast majority of youth baseball players participate in one of these organizations below.
– Little League
– Cal Ripken/Babe Ruth
Implementing the USABAT Standard on a worldwide platform enables youth baseball households to switch leagues without the stress of adapting to a different bat performance standard. Provided that your child plays to get a among the USA Baseball affiliates listed above, the USABAT standard will constantly apply to you.
1. THE SUCCESS OF THE BBCOR (BATTED BALL COEFFICIENT OF RESTITUTION)
They found that 8.8 million children played organized baseball in the calendar year 2000 vs 5.3 million in 2013. The point we’re trying to make is this: In a time once the demand for youth baseball gear is reduced, the USABAT Standard will indirectly provide a significant spike in baseball bat sales.
Among our core objectives is to provide a unique and unbiased perspective on all the aspects connected to the USABAT Standard including the business side. Having said this, it’s not possible to ignore the inevitable revenue spikes that will affect the youth baseball bat market. Please be aware, we are not suggesting that USA Baseball implemented this new standard to drive bat earnings, however how can we ignore the enormous growth in profits that comes from forcing every single youth baseball player across the country to purchase a completely new bat all at once?
In the last few decades, a number of studies have documented significant decreases in the participation of youth organized sports. According to an yearly study performed by the Sports & Fitness Industry Association, a 9% decrease occurred in the US from 2010-2015. Unfortunately, 3% of that came from the game of baseball. The same study showed that among the 5.54 million childhood baseball players in 2007 ranging from ages 6-12, 1.2 million have fell within an 8 year span as 4.34 million registered in 2015.
Within 8 years, childhood baseball has seen a 21.6% decline in participants. Hypothetically speaking, let’s say youth baseball organizations hopes to obtain an average of $200 per participant from enrollment fees, fund raising revenue, and team sponsorships.
In fact, you’d think the reduction of injuries would be the top reason why USA Baseball made the change right? Well really, they firmly say that injuries WERE NOT A FACTOR from the decision to adopt the USABAT Standard.
We understand the logic behind their answer however, the simple fact that childhood baseball will undergo a decrease in bat related injuries is something that should be praised and discussed farther instead of swept under the carpet. Using bats that limit electricity will slow down the rate on the baseball that theoretically makes the sport safer overall to some level. Positive expectations like this should not be purposefully ignored but it’s easy to know why. If USA Baseball admits that injuries are expected to decrease, that may make it seem like youth baseball has an accident “issue” in need of mending. From a company perspective, negative words like “injury” doesn’t help generating earnings. The last thing any youth sports business needs is their brand being connected to a debatable injury situation.
2. A FINANCIAL BOOST IN A DECLINING MARKET
Among our core goals is to provide a unique and unbiased perspective on most of the facets connected to the USABAT Standard such as the company side. Having said this, it’s not possible to ignore the inevitable revenue spikes which will affect the youth baseball bat marketplace. Please note, we are not implying that USA Baseball implemented this new benchmark to induce bat earnings, however how do we ignore the monumental increase in gains that comes from forcing each and every youth baseball player across the country to purchase a brand new bat all at once?
In the last few decades, a number of studies have documented significant reductions in the involvement of youth organized sports. According to an yearly study conducted by the Sports & Fitness Industry Association, a 9% decline occurred in the US from 2010-2015. Regrettably, 3 percent of which came from the game of baseball. This same study revealed that among the 5.54 million youth baseball players in 2007 ranging from ages 6-12, 1.2 million have fell over an 8 year span as 4.34 million enrolled in 2015.
Within 8 years, youth baseball has witnessed a 21.6% decline in participants. Hypothetically speaking, let us say youth baseball organizations expects to receive an average of $200 per participant from enrollment fees, fund raising earnings, and team sponsorships.
In 2015, a Wall Street Journal article mentioned a study conducted by the National Sporting Goods Association regarding youth baseball fall outs. They found that 8.8 million kids played organized baseball in the calendar year 2000 vs 5.3 million in 2013. The point we are trying to make is this: Currently when the requirement for youth baseball gear is low, the USABAT Standard will indirectly offer a substantial spike in baseball bat earnings.
For the first time in many decades, each and every youth baseball player will soon be swinging a brand new bat at 2018. Every childhood dugout in America is going to be lined with just 2018 model childhood bats. USA Baseball has repeatedly stated that the USABAT Standard is for the improvement of the sport since it will uphold the “long term integrity of the sport” with injuries and monetary profits not playing a role in the decision. This may be true, however we can’t ignore the obvious monetary gain related to implementing a new benchmark. What if tomorrow, the US government decides to implement a law that just 2018 model vehicle are allowed to be driven beginning 1/1/2018? What if the motive behind the legislation was to maintain the “long term integrity of our environment”? This hypothetical situation may be somewhat extravagant, however it does put into perspective the financial impact directly caused by USA Baseball implementing the USABAT Standard.